1Does the state have the right to take a life?
A question of principle. No statistic settles it.
Supporters say some crimes deserve the ultimate punishment. Opponents point to mistakes that can never be undone.

Capital punishment, also called the death penalty, is the execution of a person by the state as punishment for a crime, usually murder. It is one of the oldest punishments in law and one of the most fiercely debated.
Around the world, the long-term trend has been toward abolition. By the end of 2024, 113 countries had abolished the death penalty for all crimes, and 145 had abolished it in law or in practice.1 Yet recorded executions rose to at least 1,518 in 2024, the highest number since 2015, and Iran, Saudi Arabia and Iraq carried out more than 91% of them. These figures leave out China, which is believed to execute thousands of people every year but keeps its numbers secret.1
In the United States, 53% of adults supported the death penalty in 2024, the lowest level since the early 1970s.2
South Korea sits in between. The death penalty is still in its law, but no one has been executed since December 1997, when 23 people were put to death. In February 2010, the Constitutional Court ruled 5 to 4 that the death penalty does not violate the constitution's protection of human dignity.3
The debate usually comes down to three questions. Is it ever right for the state to take a life as punishment? Does the death penalty actually prevent crime? And can courts avoid executing innocent people?
Most death penalty debates are won or lost on these four questions.
A question of principle. No statistic settles it.
Both sides use the same research and read it differently.
An execution is the one sentence that can never be corrected.
Even supporters ask whether the system works as intended.
The US: 27 states still have the death penalty in law, while others have abolished it or paused executions.
South Korea: abolitionist in practice. No executions since December 1997, and the Constitutional Court upheld the law 5 to 4 in 2010.3
Debate tip: comparing countries is useful evidence on both sides. Pro can point to the global trend; Con can argue each country should decide by its own values.
Rights, deterrence and mistakes: why people who agree on the facts still end up on opposite sides.
Arguments marked “Evidence needed” are waiting for a source before this guide goes live.
Anyone can suggest improvements. An editor checks every suggestion and source before it's added, and you're credited by name.